From: vincent@wizards.com (Jason Carl) Subject: DCI 8 Player Minimum Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 14:08:14 -0800 Jeff Kuta recently posted some comments about the DCI's policy of not sanctioning tournaments which run with fewer than eight participants. Jeff asked about how the DCI arrived at this decision, and remarked that there might be other alternatives. He was also curious as to why the DCI did not make a general announcement about the change in our sanctioning policy. These are all good questions which deserve an answer. Among the many tasks within DCIıs responsibility is protecting the official ratings from fraud, abuse and artificial manipulation. Previously, an easy method of significantly increasing oneıs DCI rating was the habit of regularly participating in numerous, small tournament (i.e., tournaments with fewer than eight participants) -- doing so habitually may raise a DCI memberıs rating to artificially high levels. This is not to imply that all tournament participants in smaller events sought to achieve this goal, but rather that the problem was widespread enough that the DCI became concerned at the potential effect it could have on the official ratings. The DCI discussed (and continues to discuss) methods of reducing this problem so that all ratings are not unduly affected by this situation. The counter argument that ³cream rises,² meaning that participants who reach a premier event through the artificial increase of their ratings will be defeated by more skilled participants once they reach the actual event is may be attractive. Regardless, the DCI believes this situation is detrimental to an equitable organized play structure. The solution we have adopted at this time is to no longer sanction tournaments with fewer than eight (8) participants. We have not chosen to do so because we cannot handle the work load, or to artificially manipulate the geographic distribution of tournaments. Nor to we foresee a significant impact on the tournament community: Tournaments run with fewer than eight participants represent less than 10% of the total number of sanctioned events, and less than 2% of the total number of match, a very small number indeed. There may be other methods of regulating the effects of the tournaments in question other than by simply not sanctioning them. However, the DCI has determined that this is the best option at this time. Suggestions regarding other alternatives, or comments about our sanctioning policy, should be directed to the DCI (dci@wizards.com). The DCI announces changes in the Standard Floor Rules on a regular basis for the benefit of the tournament community at large, but changes to our sanctioning policies are normally updated in our sanctioning packets which we send to tournament coordinators and organizers. However, the DCI is more than willing to provide this information to Magic tournament participants through the customary means in the future. Sincerely yours, Jason Carl Policy Director, DCI Wizards of the Coast