Subject: post-tempest WW Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 22:13:52 GMT From: andy@mcnish.demon.co.uk (andy mcnish) Newsgroups: uk.games.trading-cards.misc thought i'd suggest a simple WW test deck for you guys to try out all your new clever decks against - if it rolls you over you're being too clever :) Land 12 plains 2 gemstones 2 UP's 2 wastelands _____ 18 (you can splash colour in the 'bord and keep them guessing which though i'd strongly suggest a sleight or two for glooms etc) (you can only get away with 18 land because of the next card) 4 tithes (these are great in WW anyway , protect vs LD and HD and are very strong in combo with the next card) 1 scroll rack (ok so it's even more broken with land tax , but we can't play that any more) 3 crusades 2 emp. armors 1 aura of solitude 2 enlightened tutors (go get any of the above 4 or stuff you 'bord in later) 3 disenchants 1 wrath 1 geddon _________ 18 then the critters... 1CC 2 vigilant martyrs (sac to regen critters or save enchantments) 3 sacred guides (sac to draw next white card in library) (don't use their ability if the opponent might cast bends/sleights!!) 2 soldari foot soldiers (i was tempted to go with 4 and drop the mesa pegasi - but i always think you just want enough 1 CC critters to drop one on the first turn and then the 2CC stuff is what you really want in hand) _____ 7 x1cc 2CC 4 white knights 4 pump knights 4 soldari priests (2/1 prot. red and shadow -yes please!) 4 master decoys (it's a 1/2 critter if he's no blockers out ; it's an icy for critters if he has...it's not a sword but it'll do for pseudo-removal - i mean how many peacekeeper decks to you actually see?) 2 mesa pegasi (not sure about these - but banding and flying are useful - freewind falcon,longbow archer and more shadow critters/mtenda herder were the other critter options) _________ 18x2cc TOTAL 61 cards mana curve: 13@1 25@2 3@3 2@4 i'm not claiming it's tuned at all but it should do ok as a test deck,and witha bit of tweaking could even do ok as a 'hangover deck' at a tourney any thoughts on anything glaringly obvious wrong with it or missing ?